I was raped by two people, one of which I knew reasonably well. I was screaming the whole time they were raping me and I believe witnesses can atest to that. The thing is, the police treated me as well as I could expect at the start. A couple of months later, I was asked to visit the police station to go over "discrepencies" that differed from witness statements. Basically, I was grilled for 45 minutes by a senior detective with a silent partner sitting by his side. The questions they were asking were similiar to those I would expect from a slimey defence barrister. He kept on asking me 'is there something you want to tell us...we won't tell your husband'. I answered all their petty questions (e.g. why didn't you say the word rape when describing to your husband what happened (straight after it happened)). He was pressuring me to confess to making the whole story up...which just wasn't true. There was no warning about this kind of treatment, no apology afterwards to even just state they had to grill me to test how I would stand up in court (the only passable reason I could think of for their behaviour). It was suggested to me that I attend a rape case to see what it's like. Now I'm thinking if the police don't have confidence in my story and they're paid to be sympathetic, how can I gain the confidence that a jury will believe me!?
Is this typical of the police? I now understand why other women don't come forward and withdraw their complaints.
Is this typical of the police? I now understand why other women don't come forward and withdraw their complaints.
Comment