hi there, i am the wife of a convicted person and I could really do with some help.
My oh was convicted of offences that date back some 28 years when he was aged 12-14yrs old he is now 40+.
and he has been in prison now for around 15mths.
It has no come to our attention recently that people who could have been called as defence witnesses for my oh were not even spoken to by his solicitor and we really think the evidence from these people could have changed how his trial went.
We did appeal his conviction based on a legal matter and were unsuccesful - basically the lawyer who represented my husband was shredded in the appeal judges report sayying it should never have reached appeal stage at all as his defence was wrong for the reason for appeal, and this pretty much confirmed what we thought at the time he wasn't doing a good job of defending my oh.
I wonder if anyone on here has any advise on how we go about having his case reviewed and instructing a new solicitor to look over everything and see if we can have a 2nd appeal based on this new witness.
We believe my oh was misrepresented and his lawyer did the bare minimum to defend him. We were receiving legal aid and being from a small town our options were limited so we were very misguided and of course extremely afraid in the whole process so clung onto the word of a lawyer who was offered to us.
We are in scotland if that helps and I know the legal system is different here but any advise would be greatly appreciated.
My oh was convicted of offences that date back some 28 years when he was aged 12-14yrs old he is now 40+.
and he has been in prison now for around 15mths.
It has no come to our attention recently that people who could have been called as defence witnesses for my oh were not even spoken to by his solicitor and we really think the evidence from these people could have changed how his trial went.
We did appeal his conviction based on a legal matter and were unsuccesful - basically the lawyer who represented my husband was shredded in the appeal judges report sayying it should never have reached appeal stage at all as his defence was wrong for the reason for appeal, and this pretty much confirmed what we thought at the time he wasn't doing a good job of defending my oh.
I wonder if anyone on here has any advise on how we go about having his case reviewed and instructing a new solicitor to look over everything and see if we can have a 2nd appeal based on this new witness.
We believe my oh was misrepresented and his lawyer did the bare minimum to defend him. We were receiving legal aid and being from a small town our options were limited so we were very misguided and of course extremely afraid in the whole process so clung onto the word of a lawyer who was offered to us.
We are in scotland if that helps and I know the legal system is different here but any advise would be greatly appreciated.
Comment