Hi everyone,
I need some help and have been reading these boards since learning a relative of mine has been accused of rape. He was arrested at home in front of his long standing girlfriend and told they just wanted a quick chat at the police station, so agreed to be interviewed without a solicitor present (stupid I know, but he was interviewed within minutes of arriving at the station before anyone could ask him to reconsider). He stated that he had met a female at a pub and they had gone for a walk and then had begun sexual touching but said he did not have sex with her. She is alleging it was all non-consensual and they did have sex, so he has been bailed. They have seized her underwear for forensics but I don't believe there is any other medical evidence as it is a fairly historic allegation, ie about 2 weeks, although I'm not 100%
The dilemma is he has now told us that he started to have sex with her but stopped after about 30 seconds because he realised that he was only doing it because he had been arguing with his girlfriend. He still states it was all consensual and says she even invited him back to her house afterwards where he was introduced to family members, she then went back out with him to get some cigarettes from the local shop, and a few days later turned up unannounced to see him. He said the only reason he didn't tell the police in interview was that he was scared it would get back to his girlfriend. Should he tell the police straight away, seek legal advice, or wait until his bail back date to say anything.
Please help, I'm worried this is going to ruin his entire life just because the police rushed him into interview and he didn't realise what he was facing.
Thanks.
I need some help and have been reading these boards since learning a relative of mine has been accused of rape. He was arrested at home in front of his long standing girlfriend and told they just wanted a quick chat at the police station, so agreed to be interviewed without a solicitor present (stupid I know, but he was interviewed within minutes of arriving at the station before anyone could ask him to reconsider). He stated that he had met a female at a pub and they had gone for a walk and then had begun sexual touching but said he did not have sex with her. She is alleging it was all non-consensual and they did have sex, so he has been bailed. They have seized her underwear for forensics but I don't believe there is any other medical evidence as it is a fairly historic allegation, ie about 2 weeks, although I'm not 100%
The dilemma is he has now told us that he started to have sex with her but stopped after about 30 seconds because he realised that he was only doing it because he had been arguing with his girlfriend. He still states it was all consensual and says she even invited him back to her house afterwards where he was introduced to family members, she then went back out with him to get some cigarettes from the local shop, and a few days later turned up unannounced to see him. He said the only reason he didn't tell the police in interview was that he was scared it would get back to his girlfriend. Should he tell the police straight away, seek legal advice, or wait until his bail back date to say anything.
Please help, I'm worried this is going to ruin his entire life just because the police rushed him into interview and he didn't realise what he was facing.
Thanks.
Comment