Hi everyone,
I have been reading this forum since our nightmare began 18 months ago, it has been a great source of support to know others are going through similar, so thank you.
Basically my partner has been accused by a group of people who are all related / friends. Read alone their 'evidence' is ridiculous and they have said things I know to be complete lies, they contradict themselves and each other too. However, I am scared that the jury will just see the number of accusers and make up their mind from the start.
He has been charged and trial is in a few months. Since he received the prosecutions evidence pack my partner has been feeling positive and spent hours everyday going through it and responding to everything they have said with what really happened. He sent his responses to his barrister a couple of weeks ago to prepare the defence statement.
However he met with the barrister yesterday who informed him he has not read any of his responses and will not because they are too long. He dismissed lots of things my partner said as 'no use'. For example, the 'main' accuser claims to have been avoiding my partner and not to have seen him for years (although how many years constantly changes in her evidence) but this is a lie and we have photos of them together in this time, and my partner knows the inside of her house as she invited him round! But the barrister says he is getting bogged down in details that are no use. This is heartbreaking as we cannot prove or disprove the actual allegations but can cast doubt on some of these details surrounding them.
So we just feel hopeless and as if the barrister has no interest in the case, and we feel he should at least read my partners responses before preparing the defence statement?!
Any advice greatly appreciated thanks.
I have been reading this forum since our nightmare began 18 months ago, it has been a great source of support to know others are going through similar, so thank you.
Basically my partner has been accused by a group of people who are all related / friends. Read alone their 'evidence' is ridiculous and they have said things I know to be complete lies, they contradict themselves and each other too. However, I am scared that the jury will just see the number of accusers and make up their mind from the start.
He has been charged and trial is in a few months. Since he received the prosecutions evidence pack my partner has been feeling positive and spent hours everyday going through it and responding to everything they have said with what really happened. He sent his responses to his barrister a couple of weeks ago to prepare the defence statement.
However he met with the barrister yesterday who informed him he has not read any of his responses and will not because they are too long. He dismissed lots of things my partner said as 'no use'. For example, the 'main' accuser claims to have been avoiding my partner and not to have seen him for years (although how many years constantly changes in her evidence) but this is a lie and we have photos of them together in this time, and my partner knows the inside of her house as she invited him round! But the barrister says he is getting bogged down in details that are no use. This is heartbreaking as we cannot prove or disprove the actual allegations but can cast doubt on some of these details surrounding them.
So we just feel hopeless and as if the barrister has no interest in the case, and we feel he should at least read my partners responses before preparing the defence statement?!
Any advice greatly appreciated thanks.
Comment