One of the things that I think we would all be interested in knowing is the actual prevalence of false accusations for which we have no real data. However it does seem to me that if we could together build some statistics that would aid our case to change things going forward.
One guide we do have access to that would perhaps be useful to publish is the amount of time it takes for Jurys to acquit.
Following the acquittal today of Aidy on here who was acquitted in 10 minutes it seems to me it would be good a good idea to keep these statistics in one place (perhaps a sticky spreadsheet).
If those who have been acquitted could reply to this thread simply saying the length of time the jury took to acquit, we might be able to build evidence that the CPS are prepared to take extremely weak cases to court and that the Police to not gather evidence "in the round".
Whilst all cases are different I think it is reasonable to assume that where Jurys reach not guilty verdicts in a very very quick time that the system has gotten something wrong because there was no reasonable prospect of a conviction.
One guide we do have access to that would perhaps be useful to publish is the amount of time it takes for Jurys to acquit.
Following the acquittal today of Aidy on here who was acquitted in 10 minutes it seems to me it would be good a good idea to keep these statistics in one place (perhaps a sticky spreadsheet).
If those who have been acquitted could reply to this thread simply saying the length of time the jury took to acquit, we might be able to build evidence that the CPS are prepared to take extremely weak cases to court and that the Police to not gather evidence "in the round".
Whilst all cases are different I think it is reasonable to assume that where Jurys reach not guilty verdicts in a very very quick time that the system has gotten something wrong because there was no reasonable prospect of a conviction.
Comment