There is often "no evidence" in sexual cases and they come down to one word against another about a matter that happens in private sadly.
First hand witness testimony is often crucial in criminal cases and not just sexual ones, someone is usually not telling the truth and cross examination is designed to test that, although it's not perfect, it's the best we have come up with in hundreds of years.
I have seen barristers complain about the "CSI effect" where juries are unhappy to convict without seeing "concrete evidence" and particularly in cases involving consent they are thought to be reluctant to convict on just the word of a complainant so in terms of the prosecution case being proven yes it can be difficult but it's really just down to how good your barrister is exposing the lies and who the jury believe.
The advice I was given was that "juries find it easier to convict someone they don't like" so it's important to present yourself well, under no circumstances lose your temper and possibly even show a bit of sympathy for the accuser who has perhaps backed herself into a corner and found no easy way out. As Frantic once said, think of it like a job interview or meeting the in laws. Impressions can count for a lot where facts are in dispute.
Another thing that can help is character referees (providing you have no previous convictions) - it can never hurt having the jury hear what a nice dependable guy you are.
First hand witness testimony is often crucial in criminal cases and not just sexual ones, someone is usually not telling the truth and cross examination is designed to test that, although it's not perfect, it's the best we have come up with in hundreds of years.
I have seen barristers complain about the "CSI effect" where juries are unhappy to convict without seeing "concrete evidence" and particularly in cases involving consent they are thought to be reluctant to convict on just the word of a complainant so in terms of the prosecution case being proven yes it can be difficult but it's really just down to how good your barrister is exposing the lies and who the jury believe.
The advice I was given was that "juries find it easier to convict someone they don't like" so it's important to present yourself well, under no circumstances lose your temper and possibly even show a bit of sympathy for the accuser who has perhaps backed herself into a corner and found no easy way out. As Frantic once said, think of it like a job interview or meeting the in laws. Impressions can count for a lot where facts are in dispute.
Another thing that can help is character referees (providing you have no previous convictions) - it can never hurt having the jury hear what a nice dependable guy you are.
Comment