We're considering closing this forum and would appreciate your thoughts, memories, comments etc, and especially any offers of help if you'd like the forum to stay running.
You may read the posts but if you wish to post yourself, then you need to register. This is simple and you just need a valid email address.
Register Here
We look forward to seeing you posting soon!
If you have already registered, but have forgotten your password, please click here to get it reset.
I now know that prosecution counsel was called to the Bar in 1975 and has won many rape cases on both sides of the courtroom. Whereas my barrister was called in 1993 and doesn't appear to have had much success in such cases as defence counsel. I really believe I don't have a chance now
So your barrister has 23 years of experience. That's a long time. They don't all post up a list of their notable cases. Hold on in there
Another point to ponder - how you felt when meeting the man is much more important than anything you read on the web.
As RightsFighter says, they don't all post things publicly. Some of them are too busy winning cases.
'Mongolian Warriors had the courage of lions, the patience of hounds, the prudence of cranes, the long-sightedness of ravens, the wildness of wolves, the passion of fightingcocks, the keenness of cats, the fury of wild boars and the cunning of foxes.' BE A MONGOLIAN WARRIOR WHEN DEFENDING YOUR INNOCENCE!
The nerves are starting to get to me. I'm a born pessimist so always see the worst before I arrive at a more balanced view. I'm aware that looking like I've lost is a sure fire way to alienate the jury. By the same token, so is Overconfidence which could be seen as arrogance. I'm sure on the day I will be much more measured than that.
What worries me most is my own experience of pride always coming before a fall. Maybe against my better judgment but I have fallen for someone and I'm scared that they will get hurt.
"You are not obliged to say anything but it WILL harm your defence if you DO mention something that might help you in court. Anything you say will be put to the complainant so they can change their story."
But that's the important bit - that you reached a balanced view.
As for falling for someone- that's lovely. These things happen when they happen. She knows what's going on so trust her to look after her own well-being. You don't have to do it all!
'Mongolian Warriors had the courage of lions, the patience of hounds, the prudence of cranes, the long-sightedness of ravens, the wildness of wolves, the passion of fightingcocks, the keenness of cats, the fury of wild boars and the cunning of foxes.' BE A MONGOLIAN WARRIOR WHEN DEFENDING YOUR INNOCENCE!
"You are not obliged to say anything but it WILL harm your defence if you DO mention something that might help you in court. Anything you say will be put to the complainant so they can change their story."
But that's the important bit - that you reached a balanced view.
As for falling for someone- that's lovely. These things happen when they happen. She knows what's going on so trust her to look after her own well-being. You don't have to do it all!
True enough but I will still feel much worse in prison than if I hadn't started a relationship. That guilt will eat me up. And this new relationship is not with a lady. Not that it matters one way or the other, though that is another worry when it comes to the trial.
"You are not obliged to say anything but it WILL harm your defence if you DO mention something that might help you in court. Anything you say will be put to the complainant so they can change their story."
And this new relationship is not with a lady. Not that it matters one way or the other, though that is another worry when it comes to the trial.
I was surprised to note that you've been a member for nearly a year so this new relationship won't be a motive for your wife's accusation against you.
However, putting myself in amongst the jury, if I became aware of this new relationship I would wonder if your wife previously had suspicions and the accusation was an act of revenge against perceived infidelity?
Indeed my infidelity is (I believe) a major part of her reasoning. However it is something freely admitted by both parties, though not, I might add, admitted by the prosecution as motive. That act of infidelity took place 11 months before the last alleged rape.
"You are not obliged to say anything but it WILL harm your defence if you DO mention something that might help you in court. Anything you say will be put to the complainant so they can change their story."
The prosecution are not likely to highlight any reason for the accusation to be false! However it would be worth discussing with your barrister as to the wisdom of divulging this motive during his cross-examination of her....it really depends on the composition of the jury.
That information is all in her ABE interview which will be her evidence in chief under special measures. The judge would probably overrule such cross-examination. She is not on trial. I believe my barrister will confine his cross-examination of her to the specific counts themselves. My sexuality will be revealed no matter what though. A homophobic jury will not be sympathetic to me
"You are not obliged to say anything but it WILL harm your defence if you DO mention something that might help you in court. Anything you say will be put to the complainant so they can change their story."
Comment