My brother was convicted on 11 counts of sexual touching yesterday.
His ex step daughter accused him after he'd had an affair and left her mother for another woman. Also he was involved in a physical altercation with her mother: at this point she went to the police and made the accusations officially.
The accusations made no sense, there were various inconsistencies and she had previously told a councillor he had raped her, even though to the police she's said it was only see touching of the breasts. Her own mother contradicted some of her points, her own brother testified against her.
There was no evidence just her video interview. The jury convicted based on that.
We're in utter shock, my brother is distraught. They reckon he's gonna get between 6-8 years for this.
One problem in the trial was a school councillor basically testified that she asked leading questions. His step daughter came to her and said she didn't want to be home with my brother. The councillor stated that she asked "has he sexually abused you". Now I work in a primary school so I know you are never allowed to ask such leading questions. Surely she should have had her evidence either thrown out or at least been questioned why she would do that?
Sorry if this is all over the place just in a real sense of shock over it.
Any help much appreciated at the moment
His ex step daughter accused him after he'd had an affair and left her mother for another woman. Also he was involved in a physical altercation with her mother: at this point she went to the police and made the accusations officially.
The accusations made no sense, there were various inconsistencies and she had previously told a councillor he had raped her, even though to the police she's said it was only see touching of the breasts. Her own mother contradicted some of her points, her own brother testified against her.
There was no evidence just her video interview. The jury convicted based on that.
We're in utter shock, my brother is distraught. They reckon he's gonna get between 6-8 years for this.
One problem in the trial was a school councillor basically testified that she asked leading questions. His step daughter came to her and said she didn't want to be home with my brother. The councillor stated that she asked "has he sexually abused you". Now I work in a primary school so I know you are never allowed to ask such leading questions. Surely she should have had her evidence either thrown out or at least been questioned why she would do that?
Sorry if this is all over the place just in a real sense of shock over it.
Any help much appreciated at the moment
Comment