Hi all
It's been a few weeks now since I was arrested, and things have been going around in my head non-stop the past few days, so apologies if I am going over old ground. I just feel the need to post this right now.
Having read through many of the posts on here it seems that most allegations are either historic (where there would be no DNA evidence), or come down to consent (where I assume that DNA evidence is largely irrelevant).
In my case, I am accused of sexual intercourse, however no sex took place. The complaint was made within 24 hours of the alleged incident, so I assume the accuser would have been checked for DNA. When it is presumably found that there is no evidence of intercourse, does anyone have experience of how likely the police are to continue investigating, or to charge in the circumstances?
Many thanks
T C
It's been a few weeks now since I was arrested, and things have been going around in my head non-stop the past few days, so apologies if I am going over old ground. I just feel the need to post this right now.
Having read through many of the posts on here it seems that most allegations are either historic (where there would be no DNA evidence), or come down to consent (where I assume that DNA evidence is largely irrelevant).
In my case, I am accused of sexual intercourse, however no sex took place. The complaint was made within 24 hours of the alleged incident, so I assume the accuser would have been checked for DNA. When it is presumably found that there is no evidence of intercourse, does anyone have experience of how likely the police are to continue investigating, or to charge in the circumstances?
Many thanks
T C
Comment