I can see so many many things happening here that it beggars belief.
The wife (soon to be ex) KNOWS about the conviction. She KNOWS the weakness. She KNOWS how to completely screw his life and get exactly what she wants, all the assets and the kids.
If ever there was a clear cut (in my mind) case of false accusation then this is it. I know that I am forever at the mercy of my partner and that if things go sour then potentially I could become a VERY easy target for her but I trust her 100% and don't believe she would ever consider a course of action similar to what is happening to your boyfriend.
It isn't just happening to your boyfriend though. It's happening to you now. His wife (ex) is potentially denying you the happiness and future that YOU deserve. She may well hate him but her chosen course of conduct is also having an affect on you. I am not even mentioning the consequences for his innocent kids in this situation as I would be here forever.
It appears to me that he is far better off being divorced from her. She is clearly a victim of societies present 'me me me' way of looking at life. I cannot possibly accept for a moment that he has raped her and yet all these things (kids, marriage, home) etc have been neatly slotted into the middle of it all.
No rape is 'minor'. If she has put the word 'minor' in the divorce papers then it beggars belief.
As for the previous conviction. It could well have been a 'plea of convenience' on legal advice of "you're screwed, go for discount". Without being privy to the details it is hard to actually understand the situation or indeed pass any form of judgement on it. It's happened, he's served his time and then got on with life. Does one conviction whether true or for other reasons actually make a person 'that' person for the rest of their lives? If the answer was ever to be yes then why release that person from jail??? Why grant them freedom? Why jail them to begin with if jail is not going to change them? Does punishment not deter re-offending and so jail technically becomes a pointless exercise because the 'law' has no alternative at their disposal?
I highly commend you for standing by him. You are clearly an extremely decent person. Many in your shoes would've not gotten involved or have ran a mile. You're looking for advice and support and help.
The wife (soon to be ex) KNOWS about the conviction. She KNOWS the weakness. She KNOWS how to completely screw his life and get exactly what she wants, all the assets and the kids.
If ever there was a clear cut (in my mind) case of false accusation then this is it. I know that I am forever at the mercy of my partner and that if things go sour then potentially I could become a VERY easy target for her but I trust her 100% and don't believe she would ever consider a course of action similar to what is happening to your boyfriend.
It isn't just happening to your boyfriend though. It's happening to you now. His wife (ex) is potentially denying you the happiness and future that YOU deserve. She may well hate him but her chosen course of conduct is also having an affect on you. I am not even mentioning the consequences for his innocent kids in this situation as I would be here forever.
It appears to me that he is far better off being divorced from her. She is clearly a victim of societies present 'me me me' way of looking at life. I cannot possibly accept for a moment that he has raped her and yet all these things (kids, marriage, home) etc have been neatly slotted into the middle of it all.
No rape is 'minor'. If she has put the word 'minor' in the divorce papers then it beggars belief.
As for the previous conviction. It could well have been a 'plea of convenience' on legal advice of "you're screwed, go for discount". Without being privy to the details it is hard to actually understand the situation or indeed pass any form of judgement on it. It's happened, he's served his time and then got on with life. Does one conviction whether true or for other reasons actually make a person 'that' person for the rest of their lives? If the answer was ever to be yes then why release that person from jail??? Why grant them freedom? Why jail them to begin with if jail is not going to change them? Does punishment not deter re-offending and so jail technically becomes a pointless exercise because the 'law' has no alternative at their disposal?
I highly commend you for standing by him. You are clearly an extremely decent person. Many in your shoes would've not gotten involved or have ran a mile. You're looking for advice and support and help.
Comment