Hi All,
At the moment i am under serious stress due to false allegation of rape and then subsequently losing my job.
Currently my biggest problem is that the police did forensics on my car and phone (police still have my phone).
The complainant and my statement differed in a few key places. One place where it differed was that the complainant said i pulled the seat down via the seat recliner. But in my statement i said the complainant pulled it down. The way i know that forensics did not take place on the seat recliner is because there is no stain on seat recliner and other forensically tested area are stained. I then rang 101, demanding to speak to officer in charge. the operator was nice and she contacted the forensics officer (she wasnt suppose to), the forensics officer confirmed no forensics carried out on seat recliner as it is 'too difficult to conduct.' I get a call back from officer in charge, who said we dont need to tell you what we do etc etc.
Not very happy i instructed my solicitor (who is my duty solicitor) to contact them by letter (got a copy) and email, which he has done without response.
I ring 101 again, later on officer in charge rang again 'there is good reason why we havent done forensics in that area, and dont keep ringing us.'
what is your take on that?
do you think that 'good reason' is good or bad for me?
what do you suggest i do? contact senior police or CPS etc?
Do you think if forensics is not carried out than there is a higher chance of charge?
Found it interesting in reading some posts, theres some good people here.
Please pray for me and Thanks for your time.
At the moment i am under serious stress due to false allegation of rape and then subsequently losing my job.
Currently my biggest problem is that the police did forensics on my car and phone (police still have my phone).
The complainant and my statement differed in a few key places. One place where it differed was that the complainant said i pulled the seat down via the seat recliner. But in my statement i said the complainant pulled it down. The way i know that forensics did not take place on the seat recliner is because there is no stain on seat recliner and other forensically tested area are stained. I then rang 101, demanding to speak to officer in charge. the operator was nice and she contacted the forensics officer (she wasnt suppose to), the forensics officer confirmed no forensics carried out on seat recliner as it is 'too difficult to conduct.' I get a call back from officer in charge, who said we dont need to tell you what we do etc etc.
Not very happy i instructed my solicitor (who is my duty solicitor) to contact them by letter (got a copy) and email, which he has done without response.
I ring 101 again, later on officer in charge rang again 'there is good reason why we havent done forensics in that area, and dont keep ringing us.'
what is your take on that?
do you think that 'good reason' is good or bad for me?
what do you suggest i do? contact senior police or CPS etc?
Do you think if forensics is not carried out than there is a higher chance of charge?
Found it interesting in reading some posts, theres some good people here.
Please pray for me and Thanks for your time.
Comment