Hi Believe
I replied to this on your other thread before I read this one - DOH!
Just a careful word...the fact that she is claiming this happened on more than one occasion is not unfeasible, espeically given hubby's job. She might claim that she was "too scared" to cut all ties with him, or even that he had threatened to "hurt" her loved ones if she told anyone.
However.....the allegation has gone from "rape" to "sexual touching". This was exactly what happened in Mr Saffron's case. After forensics proved that no sex had actually taken place, the FA changed her statement from "I woke up to find a colleague lying on top of me, having sex with me" to "I woke up to find a colleague sitting beside me, touching my genitals with his fingers". Quite some change, for a sexually active 25 year old. How on earth could she have made that mistake, especially as she "reported" the day after the incident. Not years, months or even weeks or days afterwards - a matter of hours afterwards. You would think that no jury in the world would convict on that basis.....
Unfortunately our barrister completely failed to draw attention to these glaring differences and so the jury never even heard or read her first statement.
Anyway, sorry I am digressing.
As others have said, now you can be proactive. You will get full disclosure. You can start picking her apart.
It's an odd feeling. The wait is over for the time being and you can start doing something about it.
Good luck!
I replied to this on your other thread before I read this one - DOH!
Just a careful word...the fact that she is claiming this happened on more than one occasion is not unfeasible, espeically given hubby's job. She might claim that she was "too scared" to cut all ties with him, or even that he had threatened to "hurt" her loved ones if she told anyone.
However.....the allegation has gone from "rape" to "sexual touching". This was exactly what happened in Mr Saffron's case. After forensics proved that no sex had actually taken place, the FA changed her statement from "I woke up to find a colleague lying on top of me, having sex with me" to "I woke up to find a colleague sitting beside me, touching my genitals with his fingers". Quite some change, for a sexually active 25 year old. How on earth could she have made that mistake, especially as she "reported" the day after the incident. Not years, months or even weeks or days afterwards - a matter of hours afterwards. You would think that no jury in the world would convict on that basis.....
Unfortunately our barrister completely failed to draw attention to these glaring differences and so the jury never even heard or read her first statement.
Anyway, sorry I am digressing.
As others have said, now you can be proactive. You will get full disclosure. You can start picking her apart.
It's an odd feeling. The wait is over for the time being and you can start doing something about it.
Good luck!
Comment