Originally posted by Maryrose
View Post
Anyways, at the end of it all he pled guilty (to some bits) against our best efforts BUT it was also understood that his chances of mounting a defence of any kind were slim. His ex-wife, the accuser, had a history of being abused in scarily similar ways. She was well versed in mental health and psychology so she KNEW what buttons to press to get the reactions she sought. Why in hell she wanted those reactions is anyones guess as most would wish to calm a situation!
He's now filing for divorce. SHE can't understand it!!!!!!! A totally weird and messed up situation which is beyond comprehension but she IS ill and likes to be a victim.
Just my two pence worth....
With regards to your situation. If you can gather evidence to PROVE that the '3 weeks prior' episode did not happen then you've cleared your first hurdle in defence. If you are 100% certain it never happened then make the proving of it your first challenge, after that the more complex stuff will get easier and easier. I am not sure what weight 'previous allegations' will have in court (where's Rights Fighter when you need her?) as the actual raising of them may not be possible BUT the prosecutors/Police should be looking at them before deciding how to proceed.
I would not bog yourself down with the extreme details of the allegations against your boy. Everything is deliberately put to make him sound as if he is guilty. Un-pick it all and throw it back at them as INNOCENT. Keep everything going through your legal team, don't give anything to the Police.
Comment