I wonder if one of the legal team could advise on this. My son has a solicitor who is a criminal lawyer with Higher Rights of Audience, has told me he's defended and won similar cases, appears to be taking his case seriously, is spending time on it and who ***** has good contact with and likes. Although he does seem very competent, he's not a specialised sol. I did try to insist he see someone who specialises in this field early on but he's reluctant to change. The solicitor has said that he will defend ***** in court if he can .
- In general is it better to have a solicitor who has higher rights and who does it all or a sol + a barrister. In this case, who chooses the barrister?
- As ***** will be tried alongside someone who's being tried for rape and who there appears to be evidence against, I feel this needs to be someone who's extremely competent and will be very familiar with the case.
- In general is it better to have a solicitor who has higher rights and who does it all or a sol + a barrister. In this case, who chooses the barrister?
- As ***** will be tried alongside someone who's being tried for rape and who there appears to be evidence against, I feel this needs to be someone who's extremely competent and will be very familiar with the case.
Comment