We're considering closing this forum and would appreciate your thoughts, memories, comments etc, and especially any offers of help if you'd like the forum to stay running.
You may read the posts but if you wish to post yourself, then you need to register. This is simple and you just need a valid email address.
Register Here
We look forward to seeing you posting soon!
If you have already registered, but have forgotten your password, please click here to get it reset.
And God promised men that good and obedient wives would be found in all corners of the world. Then made the world round .... and laughed and laughed and laughed ..
Hi BN, it's a sod it has had to go over to another day been thinking about you so much and hope your holding up.
I really hope we get to read the post we are all waiting for , hope to hear something later.
well today didnt go that well. i was found not guilty of rape but found guilty of attempted anal rape. both my barrister and the judge couldnt believe it. the attempted anal sex was following consentual vaginal sex, within seconds (change of position) which consisted of me going to penetrate, she said no so i stopped. i assumed consent through action and as soon as she said no i stopped. i cannot believe it.
does anyone know if i have grounds for appeal (my barrister is looking into inconstent verdict) or does anyone know of a similar case? both the barrister and judge suggested sentencing would be hard as the ccase is very unusual.
Holy Cr4p. How is that possible? Not guilty of rape, but guilty of attempted anal rape? Surely if she claimed you raped her, but they decided it didn;t happen, how can they then decide that the "attempted" anal rape actually happened?
I think LS has summed this up elsewhere on this site: "you can't defend yourself against 'attempted' anything".
I'm sorry, but no-one can tell you whether you have grounds for appeal without seeing all the paperwork and the trial transcripts. What has your barrister said?
Thinking of you
Found it. Unfortunately the judgement is not in the public domain so I cannot provide a link to it but please give these details to your solicitor/barrister asap. Neutral Citation Number: [2011] EWCA Crim 1006 No: 201003303/D1 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL DIVISION
Name of Kepinski ~ dated March 21st 2010
If the solicitor does not have access to the database I do then please ask him/her to email me.
Hiya, that judgement is, as you say, totally inconsistant. I truly don't understand it. Being practical, a lot of chaps think anal sex might be a good plan while having sex, and a lot of women do not agree with this - and if you stopped that's the end of it surely. If you were found to be having consensual sex, which you were, surely any position is also consensual - until/if where individuals say "No" and then the other party stops what they were up to and then do something which pleases both parties. Crikey, I knew the law was a twisty turny thing but this is simply nonsensical.
Hope you get to appeal this
Kind regards
Jen
False Accusers Beware: You have chosen to dine at the Karma Cafe. There is no menu: you will just get what you deserve.
thank you for your help rights fighter, i will forward that on to my barrister and solicitor. If anybody else no of any others then please send them my way as I would be most grateful. Do people know if I can remain on bail whilst appeal is being processed or is that unheard of?
we were all gob smacked by the verdict.
The jury said guilty to the attempted rape before deciding on the rape (which came back not guilty), and at that point we thought that the rape would come back guilty too. But thankfully not.
Now just need to try and sort this "inconsistant verdict" out.
Comment