Re: Jack Tweed case.
Just thought I ought to point out that he was found Not Guilty - ie: the jury decided that there was not enough evidence to prove guilt. This doesn't mean that the girl lied. The whole thing was pretty sordid on both sides. I would be horrified if my 21 year old son was having threesomes with a mate and a girl they picked up in a club.
I'm not saying that justice wasn't done, but as we all know, the law is an ass. Miscarriages of justice happen all the time on both sides.
I am also frankly very disturbed that the jury only considered the evidence for 20 minutes. The trial lasted 2 weeks, for goodness sake! That is not a carefully-considered verdict. (I was outraged that the jury in R's case took a mere 45 minutes to think about 3 days' worth of evidence.) But in this case the jury dedicated just 20 minutes for 2 weeks' worth of evidence? That's two minutes of deliberation for each day of the trial, without them taking loo/cigarette/lunch breaks. The only thing this proves to me is that trial by jury is a complete lottery.
Sorry to hijack your thread, WEDID, I just felt I ought to point this out, as we have a number of members who are genuine survivors, yet their attackers were acquitted/not charged.
Just thought I ought to point out that he was found Not Guilty - ie: the jury decided that there was not enough evidence to prove guilt. This doesn't mean that the girl lied. The whole thing was pretty sordid on both sides. I would be horrified if my 21 year old son was having threesomes with a mate and a girl they picked up in a club.
I'm not saying that justice wasn't done, but as we all know, the law is an ass. Miscarriages of justice happen all the time on both sides.
I am also frankly very disturbed that the jury only considered the evidence for 20 minutes. The trial lasted 2 weeks, for goodness sake! That is not a carefully-considered verdict. (I was outraged that the jury in R's case took a mere 45 minutes to think about 3 days' worth of evidence.) But in this case the jury dedicated just 20 minutes for 2 weeks' worth of evidence? That's two minutes of deliberation for each day of the trial, without them taking loo/cigarette/lunch breaks. The only thing this proves to me is that trial by jury is a complete lottery.
Sorry to hijack your thread, WEDID, I just felt I ought to point this out, as we have a number of members who are genuine survivors, yet their attackers were acquitted/not charged.
Comment