Police Investigations into Historic Abuse

[hello88]

Because we had my grandson since he was 2 (10 years) we were heavily involved with SS as he was considered a "Looked after child" and under the jurisdiction of the Children's Panel in Scotland.

EVERY SINGLE ONE of our accusers had extreme involvement with SS , all but one having been in care at some point.
We know for a fact that one of them , at younger than nine, had been shown "pornographic material".
The ringleader was known to my 2nd sol as he had a son at the same school- on hearing the name, the first thing he said was that he knew him, he was the lout who had tried to set another pupil on fire and was frequently reported for hitting the school bus driver. He had also attacked kids at school, he thumped a friend of mine's son the day after OH's arrest, we suspect for refusing to join in.

He sexually assaulted my grandson. One of the complainants at trial said this nasty piece of work bullied him into making accusations.

Did anyone take any of this into consideration? Was any of this made available to the defence? The police do nothing.
In my case, accuser claimed the car I had driven at him and his pal (although he wasn't actually there when I had the misfortune to have to pass him in a narrow lane) was "Black, but not very black" when in fact it was a very pale metallic lilac. Did the cops bother? All they had to do was look!!!! Did they??



NO

remembering sending a sarcastic email regarding cars to OIC... soemthing along the lines of.... clearly the car where part of this abuse apparantly happened was not a car that we had till 4 years after the abuse (the last couple or months living in the neighbourhood)... but of course you know that because you would of checked DVLA records already, right????

clearly was having 'one of those days'

[slowdown73]

Yes well Said Shah......

With all due respect I think we all know what is written on the "internet " regarding police Investigations legislation etc!!!!!

The Sheer truth of the matter is it really does mean absolutely FA!!!

People often think that they can trust the relevant authorities; ie CPS,POLICE,SOCIAL SERVICES,ETC to follow guidelines and legislation........

The truth of the matter is this is naivety........

Many on this forum would agree......that these authorities are corrupt......show a blatant lack of common sense....and show blatant disregard to the utter damage False accusers can cause.........

In my own experience..... Social services for example are without doubt the most....institutionally corrupt........ Many are unqualified...... And many are deeply disconnected with the "real world".....as someone quite rightly said SS stands for **** stirrers!!

Yes of course there are also good honest......people working for these authorities....ie in the police......CPS ss etc

But the sad truth is......institutional corruption in many of these so called public authorities/agencies is clearly very apparent......and if anybody is to believe other wise then they are seriously very naive....


And to those people who believe that they are safe and can expect an honest trustworthy service from these authorities (Police CPS,ss etc).....God help you.......!!!!


I have personally witnessed....many many things in my experience with these authorities...from racism......discrimination..... Fabricating....paperwork...to suit thier needs.....and I haven't even got started yet!......

I think my previous post has been taken out of context. The person who started the thread was asking about what kinds of things the Police do during an investigation. I replied based on my own knowledge of the system. It doesn't mean I agree with the way they carry out their investigations or think that they do this fairly. Having been a victim of a false allegation, it infuriates me the way the Police go about some of their business which often has little regard for exposing the real truth and more interest in meeting their conviction stats. As stated before, the Police do have certain guidelines which they have to follow but often these are not followed in a very fair or unbiased way. A good investigation is supposed to be impartial and take into account both sides and most of us on here would agree the Police often dismiss any evidence which undermines an allegation. I don't want people to get the wrong idea on here and think that I support the Police in any way because I certainly don't.