This situation wouldn't happen if the system had done its job properly, too often cases go to court and the Crown know their clients have lied, even to the extent of editing the lies exaggerations and contradictions out in transcripts - aiding and abetting the crime and criminal.
I accept Saffron anyone should and has the right to post, it makes for a more meaningful and interesting debate, however one should understand the failures of the system and the damage it promotes even supports and sponsors
It is no surprise some real victims are afraid of the system as much as anyone falsely accused, you read so many reports of trials where the accused was guilty by admitted the crime YET maintained their innocence?
Why should anyone have the right to a trial when their admit their crime? Can or should a jury find someone innocent of any crime they admit they committed? That is simply incomprehensible and preposterous.
I accept Saffron anyone should and has the right to post, it makes for a more meaningful and interesting debate, however one should understand the failures of the system and the damage it promotes even supports and sponsors
It is no surprise some real victims are afraid of the system as much as anyone falsely accused, you read so many reports of trials where the accused was guilty by admitted the crime YET maintained their innocence?
Why should anyone have the right to a trial when their admit their crime? Can or should a jury find someone innocent of any crime they admit they committed? That is simply incomprehensible and preposterous.
Comment