We're considering closing this forum and would appreciate your thoughts, memories, comments etc, and especially any offers of help if you'd like the forum to stay running.
You may read the posts but if you wish to post yourself, then you need to register. This is simple and you just need a valid email address.
Register Here
We look forward to seeing you posting soon!
If you have already registered, but have forgotten your password, please click here to get it reset.
I've asked the question in a sols and barristers FB group. How strange. Maybe he had to contribute, although saying that, surely he wouldn't be entitled to a penny.......
"Quite probably his assets would have been frozen and so we had to pick up the tab (I don't know anything about this case, but that is common)."
Another response
I'd imagine it's because his assets were probably frozen and so he couldn't pay for representation. The same thing happened with Op Cotton.
And
Restraint Order, no doubt, but the greedy government won't allow access to the funds to allow him to pay his legal costs as they want in confiscation #robbingpetertopaypaul
Tweet
Comment