Tweet
In today's issue Anthony France goes to great lengths to claim that "9 out of 10 child sex offences go unpunished," and that 1 in 10 or "thousands of child sex offenders escape scot-free."
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...0-minutes.html
He neglects to say that just because an offence has been "reported" does not necessarily mean a valid event actually took place. We know that ourselves from false rape accusations how easy it is to falsely accuse; it doesn't always follow that the allegation is in any way the truth.
Also, the age of the "children" in these "child sex offences" are often teenagers, and are very worldly-wise at twisting adults (particularly the police) into believing them. But the sun would have you believe that all child sex allegations are against five year olds. Of course, he had to post an accompanying picture of a 5-year old, because he'd like you to believe that is the (incorrect) age of most victims.
They claim there were 23,097 offences reported last year but only 2,135 resulted in a conviction. Could it be, Mr France, that that figure is so low because the vast majority of alleged offences were against teenagers?
Tellingly, ALSO in today's paper is a report of a 14-year old lad who filmed himself having sex with a 14-year old girl and posted it on Facebook. THERE, Mr France, is one child sex offence and it wasn't even committed by an adult.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...-Facebook.html
As they are so keen to tar us all with the same brush, this matter is relevant to anyone FA'd, because articles like this one bring out the scum of the earth calling for medieval punishment, and it's not confined to "paedos."
Anthony France from The Sun, you may love to write the word paedo as many as EIGHT times in one tiny article, but I have one word that describes you totally:
WANKER
If anyone wants to write to the twat and tell him what they think, like I did, his email is a.france@the-sun.co.uk
People like that cnut really make my blood boil. I can't wait for that newspaper to get flushed away by the Murdochs.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...0-minutes.html
He neglects to say that just because an offence has been "reported" does not necessarily mean a valid event actually took place. We know that ourselves from false rape accusations how easy it is to falsely accuse; it doesn't always follow that the allegation is in any way the truth.
Also, the age of the "children" in these "child sex offences" are often teenagers, and are very worldly-wise at twisting adults (particularly the police) into believing them. But the sun would have you believe that all child sex allegations are against five year olds. Of course, he had to post an accompanying picture of a 5-year old, because he'd like you to believe that is the (incorrect) age of most victims.
They claim there were 23,097 offences reported last year but only 2,135 resulted in a conviction. Could it be, Mr France, that that figure is so low because the vast majority of alleged offences were against teenagers?
Tellingly, ALSO in today's paper is a report of a 14-year old lad who filmed himself having sex with a 14-year old girl and posted it on Facebook. THERE, Mr France, is one child sex offence and it wasn't even committed by an adult.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...-Facebook.html
As they are so keen to tar us all with the same brush, this matter is relevant to anyone FA'd, because articles like this one bring out the scum of the earth calling for medieval punishment, and it's not confined to "paedos."
Anthony France from The Sun, you may love to write the word paedo as many as EIGHT times in one tiny article, but I have one word that describes you totally:
WANKER
If anyone wants to write to the twat and tell him what they think, like I did, his email is a.france@the-sun.co.uk
People like that cnut really make my blood boil. I can't wait for that newspaper to get flushed away by the Murdochs.
Comment